Time to answer some
questions…
Kenny Nowling gives the lowdown on what Pro Modified racing will be
on the NHRA side of things
By Brian Wood
Photos by Roger Richards
|

|
|
Kenny
Nowling
|
|
|
In 2001, the NHRA brought
aboard the Pro Modified division on an exhibition basis. Billed as an
eight-car shootout at a limited number of events, this highly volatile
division attracted a major sponsor through AMS Staff Leasing’s Dave
Wood, a self-professed fan of the class. The timing couldn’t have been
worse for the division as its introduction was overshadowed by the
highly-controversial Pro Stock Truck Lawsuit. There were times when its
mere existence in the future was questioned.
Despite the travails, the AMS Pro Mod Challenge will return in 2005
with extra backing from Texas-based businessman Tommy Lipar. The class is
said to be undergoing a dramatic transformation which would eliminate a
large portion of cross-over participation from IHRA racers. The word is
the line is now drawn in the sand.
AMS Pro Mod Challenge presented by TLR administrator Kenny Nowling
has been the topic of many conversations in the Pro Mod pits. We caught up
with him and asked a few questions as to the future of the class in NHRA
competition.
a
d v e r t i s e m e n t

Click
to visit our sponsor's website
|

|
|
Nowling
is quick to credit AMS Staff Leasing’s Founder/President Dave
Wood as the reason Pro Modified in the NHRA has advanced to level
that it has.
|
|
|
CP - I guess the million dollar question is should Pro Modified
racers start getting excited about the things coming their way in the NHRA
in 2005?
KN – I would say so – without question the
NHRA AMS Staff Leasing Pro Mod Challenge has been the premier Pro Mod
series in the county for the past three years. It’s going to be even
more so now that we have 14 events, 16 car fields, increased payouts
totaling over $660,000.00, contingency, a $25,000.00 to win Clash and a
$100,000.00 Championship point fund. And remember you don’t have to pay
an entry fee to run our series. Not to mention our outstanding television
package with ESPN2. I’d say it’s a pretty good time to be a Pro Mod
fan, racer or sponsor.
CP – In the IHRA, Pro Modified is a professional category.
Will it still be tagged as an exhibition program in NHRA for 2005?
KN – People can refer to it however they want.
The fact is that these guys are professionals. I’ve never been in a
negotiating session with a potential sponsor and been asked, “Are you a
pro class?” I think people are putting too much weight into that.
Mike Ashley is probably the best example of a Pro Mod team owner
that has not used the word “exhibition” as a crutch or an excuse not
to go out and market his team and acquire sponsorship. The AMS Staff
Leasing Pro Mod Challenge presented by TLR provides Pro Mod teams with an
excellent platform to attract sponsors.
So to answer your question…will it be tagged as an exhibition
category? Yes, it will. Will that stop me or others from procuring
sponsorships? Not at all. The bottom line is that it is all about
exposure. If you race a Pro Mod car the AMS Staff Leasing Pro Mod
Challenge presented by TLR is the absolute best place to get exposure,
period.
a
d v e r t i s e m e n t
Click to visit our sponsor's
website
|

|
|
Tommy
Lipar joined Wood in presenting the richest program NHRA Pro Mod
has ever had.
|
|
|
CP - Has the Pro Stock Truck lawsuit had a lot to do with how
the negotiations with the NHRA have gone?
KN - I think so. Without the Pro Stock Truck
lawsuit I believe that the class would be progressing a little faster
within the NHRA. Don’t get me wrong though, I’m very happy with where
we are. I am just eternally grateful that the NHRA’s President Tom
Compton has seen the value in our program. His belief in Pro Mod is the
single biggest reason that Pro Mod has continued within the NHRA.
CP - Can you give us some more details regarding the size of
the fields for 2005, as well as the number of events?
KN - The series will actually be comprised of 14
races, 10 of which will be run at NHRA POWERade events. We are still
working on finalizing 4 more events, all of which will be for one points
championship. We will absolutely have 16 car fields, and to accommodate
that we’ve reduced qualifying from 4 sessions to 3. Two on Friday and
one on Saturday, then we’ll have the first round on Saturday night with
the remaining three rounds on Sunday.
The 10 NHRA POWERade events will still be an invited field.
There’s a committee that has been formed to make the invitations and
we’ll have a press release soon concerning the procedures the racers
will need to follow to get their name on the list of potential invitees. I
am often asked why the invited fields at the NHRA POWERade events. The
answer is the NHRA simply does not have room for sixty or more Pro Mods
with all of the other entries in all of the other classes. And believe me
that is what they would have if they did not limit the entries to 20-24.
|

|
|
"Mike
Ashley is probably the best example of a Pro Modified team owner
that has not used the word “exhibition” as a crutch or an
excuse not to go out and market a team and acquire a sponsorship.
He has been very successful." – Kenny Nowling
|
|
|
CP - So these four events… where are they going to be?
KN - It looks like we’re definitely going to go
to No Problem Raceway in Belle Rose, LA. As of now, that is all I know.
CP – Will the core ten race NHRA POWERade event schedule
remain the same as it was this season?
KN- There has been one change - we won’t be
returning to Memphis. Instead, we will be going to Las Vegas twice.
a
d v e r t i s e m e n t
Click to visit our sponsor's
website
CP – The million dollar question that everyone seems to have
is what are the rules?
KN –I’ll start with the nitrous cars. We will
use the current foundation of the IHRA rulebook with the exception of the
cubic inch limit. There is no limit. When the IHRA expanded the cubic inch
limit recently, most, if not all of the teams took advantage of it. We
feel like that if the IHRA had gone to say 815-inches, then the racers
would have built them. We want the nitrous cars to stay competitive
because they are an important part of the future of our series. We want
them to be involved on the AMS/TLR Pro Mod Challenge contrary to the
rumors that are circulating. We just feel the class needs to move forward
not backwards. The blower cars are continually getting punished every time
they make increases in performance. They do their homework and change
their combinations knowing that if they run quicker they are going to get
penalized with a rules change. To me that’s not drag racing and
certainly not what our sponsors are interested in.
Our sponsors want a five-second, 240 mph class. We believe the
nitrous cars can become a part of that. We have also reduced the weight
for the nitrous cars. The current minimum weight for a nitrous car is
2,375 pounds. That has been reduced to 2,300 pounds for anything 1973 or
newer. Anything 1972 or older will be required to weigh 2,200 pounds with
the exception of 1963 – 1967 Corvettes which will be required to weigh
2,250 pounds.
The blown combination will go back to 29% overdrive. Anything 1973
or newer will be required to weigh 2700 pounds. Anything 1972 or older
will be required to weigh 2,600 pounds with the exception of 1963 – 1967
Corvettes which will be required to weigh 2,650 pounds.
We don’t want to eliminate the new cars entirely because we are
aware that fans exist for them. There was a real concern of an identity
crisis with Pro Stock that we had to consider though. We also feel that
there are far too many 1963 Corvettes competing. We hope the weight rules,
if nothing else, will get some teams to build some nostalgia type cars.
|

|
|
With
the new rule structure for 2005, turbocharged cars will be part of
the show.
|
|
|
CP – Who determined these rules?
KN – This was the job of a rules committee that
Tommy Lipar and Dave Wood consulted with. The members of the committee
wanted to remain anonymous. I can tell you as a non-voting member of that
committee and a consultant only to Mr. Wood and Mr. Lipar, the reason
these people asked for anonymity is that they have businesses to run and
cannot be on the phone 24 hours a day being lobbied by racers, sponsors
and fans as I have. Part of their conditions for contributing was based on
anonymity. I can tell you that one is a chassis builder, one is someone
that has a lot of experience with the nitrous combination and one is
someone that has a lot of experience with the blown combination.
a
d v e r t i s e m e n t
Click to visit our sponsor's
website
CP – Will turbochargers be included in the program?
KN – Absolutely, they will. But, we will keep an
eye on them. There will be a minimum number of cars invited to each race.
We feel there’s a future in the class for them. We will monitor them
closely with the assistance of some engine builders. It’s going to be a
learning curve and those drivers have been put on alert that rule changes
will be made liberally to adjust to their performance.
Everyone tells me that the turbo cars have always dominated every
class they’ve entered. I don’t think you can necessarily apply that
same logic here. I don’t see a turbo car running 5.80s at 250 mph.
However, if that did happen adjustments would be made. The IHRA has worked
for years to maintain parity and we intend to do the same. It’s not that
we are trying to get away from that with the 29% over for the blower cars
and by adding turbo cars. We just feel that parity can be achieved with
our changes. It will just be parity in the 5 second zone instead of the
6.20s.
CP – Aren’t you afraid that the new rules will prevent
crossover participation on non-conflicting dates with the IHRA?
|

|
|
The
nitrous cars will be able to run at less weight and arm themselves
with 815+ cubic inches.
|
|
|
KN – That is definitely something that we were
concerned about in the early going. My obligation to our sponsors though
is to get them the most exposure that I can. I just feel that 5 second 240
mph Pro Mods will just be much more entertaining to our fans…it all
comes down to marketability. We feel that the class has gotten stagnant
and needs a shot in the arm. The class has continually been restrained and
not allowed to progress.
Does it upset me that a team can’t run IHRA one week and then the
NHRA the next week with the same combination? Yes it does. We are for the
racer and we are doing everything we can for them. However, given the
current budgets, one thing that no one is considering is that eventually
the teams are going to have to choose one or the other. I hate that. In
some instances, some of the lower budgeted teams are going to have to make
that choice. There are a lot of racers that have really stretched their
budgets. I for one am grateful for their efforts because it has helped us
to build this program when there wasn’t a lot of money on the line.
I feel bad, but I always felt that a separation between the two was
coming anyway. However, it all goes back to our sponsors and putting the
best show we can on the track in 2005. I have no doubt in 2005 we will be
putting the best Pro Mod show on the track. You can’t tell me that a 5
second, 240 mile per hour show won’t be more entertaining than a 6.2
second, 220 mile per hour show.
I wish the IHRA all the best. I’ll continue to follow their
series as a fan. I will root them on and I’m excited about the programs
that have been put into place for the Pro Mod teams over there for 2005. I
think the two series will create a competition amongst themselves and that
can only be good for three parties – the fans, the racers and the
sponsors. I think it will force each one to up the ante. It will keep the
product fresh and entertaining.
|

|
|
"I
wish the IHRA all the best. I’ll continue to follow their series
as a fan. I will root them on and I’m excited about the programs
that have been put into place for the Pro Mod drivers over there
in 2005. I think the two series will create a competition amongst
themselves and that can only be good for three parties – the
fans, the racers and the sponsors. I think it will force each one
to up the ante. It will keep the product fresh and
entertaining." – Kenny Nowling
|
|
|
CP – What is the NHRA’s take on things?
KN – There’s been a lot of questions asked as
to why the NHRA’s name is not going to be associated with the class
logo. In my opinion, as a result of the Pro Stock Truck lawsuit, they have
to be cautious in how they move forward with Pro Mod.
I have to reiterate that a lot of people use the “exhibition”
status as a crutch to not go out and get sponsors. I know it’s not easy
to get sponsor dollars, but it is not impossible.
Again, a racer has to look at why they are racing. Are they racing
to earn a living off of the purses or do the purses just offset expenses?
In the past the drivers have had to run the IHRA on a conflicting race
weekend strictly for financial reasons. We’ve taken that out of the
equation now. There’s no question that the IHRA is growing. With their
new President Aaron Polburn, I think they are going to make great strides.
Bill Bader did a great job and I think Aaron will do a great job as well.
I think the IHRA’s Pro Mod class will continue to grow and be
successful. That doesn’t mean ours can’t be successful too. When you
look at the cold, hard factual numbers the AMS/TLR Pro Mod Challenge will
be the best place for teams to get the most exposure. The money is there
and the television is there too.
This is not intended to be a competition, but when it comes to
conflicting events…the racers are going to have to make a choice.
That’s unfortunate. We will do our best in the future to eliminate the
scheduling conflicts.
I want to dispel these myths that suggest the NHRA doesn’t want
Pro Mod. If they didn’t want the class, they wouldn’t have it. They
would just say goodbye. Through the hard work of many individuals behind
the scenes, this program is growing and in 2005 will take a huge step in
the right direction.
The NHRA had every opportunity to ask us to get off the train when
it was leaving the station. But, they didn’t. I just can’t thank Tom
Compton, Graham Light, Gary Darcy, John Siragusa and the entire NHRA for
giving us this opportunity.
Return
to Contents
|