BME DRAGSTER AXED FROM TESTING - UPDATED
Bill Miller was as mad as
a man could get Friday afternoon. So mad was the veteran piston manufacturer
whose Top Fuel dragster runs a limited schedule that he was rebooking his plane
tickets to fly home early Saturday morning. He’d planned to spend a weekend
testing his new Top Fuel dragster and working with new driver Troy Buff.
That was the plan that
never came to fruition.
Instead Miller was
notified by NHRA Director of Top Fuel & Funny Car racing Dan Olson that his
chassis was illegal per the established S.F.I. specs mandated. The safety
conscious Miller was taken aback by the ruling.
Miller was essentially
eliminated because he said he took safety to the next level.
“Dan Olson said because the car did not have the joint that combines the driver’s compartment to the inch-and-a-half .095 tubing at the rear of the three verticals that come together, made the car illegal,” Miller said. “Basically I didn’t want a ‘break-me-here spot in the car’ and I did that because you can’t tell me how a car will crash every time.”
Bill Miller was as mad as
a man could get Friday afternoon. So mad was the veteran piston manufacturer
whose Top Fuel dragster runs a limited schedule that he was rebooking his plane
tickets to fly home early Saturday morning. He’d planned to spend a weekend
testing his new Top Fuel dragster and working with new driver Troy Buff.
That was the plan that
never came to fruition.
Instead Miller was
notified by NHRA Director of Top Fuel & Funny Car racing Dan Olson that his
chassis was illegal per the established S.F.I. specs mandated. The safety
conscious Miller was taken aback by the ruling.
Miller was essentially
eliminated because he said he took safety to the next level.
“Dan Olson said because
the car did not have the joint that combines the driver’s compartment to the
inch-and-a-half .095 tubing at the rear of the three verticals that come
together, made the car illegal,” Miller said. “Basically I didn’t want a
‘break-me-here spot in the car’ and I did that because you can’t tell me how a
car will crash every time.”
Miller built his chassis
in-house under the guidance of noted chassis expert Don Long. He pointed out
that he used Dr. Rory Davis’s Finite Element Analysis to build what he said was
a safer car than the spec.
“Listen to Don Long,”
Miller said. “He says if you can’t describe the crash, you can’t describe the
solution.”
Speculation throughout the
Firebird Raceway pits and beyond today suggests this was in retaliation to
Miller’s outspoken nature regarding the use of heat-treated versus normalized
tubing in nitro chassis designs. Regardless of the basis for this ruling,
Miller said the decision to not allow his car to run is a kick in the gut.
“It didn’t meet the S.F.I.
spec,” Olson said in a telephone interview Friday evening.
Olson said Miller was given
the copy of the spec.
“He already had the paper but
for whatever reason, which is beyond me, he did it,” Olson said. “I have no idea
why he did it that way. The spec is the spec and it is black and white. It’s easy
to understand. The drawing shows exactly the way it should be done.
“All the other cars have it,
the Hadman,
Olson has an opposing view
regarding Miller’s claims the chassis is safer.
“It’s not even close to the
spec,” Olson said.
Having NHRA officials in town
for the weekend testing was somewhat of a different scenario than last weekend in
The NHRA has legalized a
new chassis specification for the Top Fuel division and labeled it as SFI Spec
2.3N and it will become effective as of April 21, 2008. The gives all teams the
opportunity to have new cars or existing ones brought into spec by the NHRA
Southern Nationals in Atlanta, Ga.
The new spec will be
one-and-a-half inch .095 chromoly tubing on the top and bottom rail with
sleeves in each bend. The bend at the rear firewall, at top and bottom will
require a sleeve. The bend at the front of the motor that goes up to the hoop
will also require a sleeve in it too.